Very rarely do I program more than five reps of of a main lift for an athlete. Why?
For beginners: it helps keep technique in check and helps them to stay focused (I often see the young athlete’s eyes glaze over and head turn left+right to look at other distractions once he or she passes the 5-rep mark!).
For the intermediate and advanced lifters: low reps keep recovery prompt and hold muscle soreness at bay. Having an athlete perform sets of ten to twenty on the squat would leave him/her absolutely torched come game day or time for sport-specific technique work.
Not to mention, sets of four to five reps seem to be the crossroad for muscle building and neural training. You can still pack on some size, while at the same time teaching the neuromuscular system to contract faster and with greater force.
Anyway, higher reps can still have their place in training, especially for the “Joe’s and Jane’s” out there simply looking to pack on some lean body mass. I have also found that some athletes respond better to higher reps, but I still want to keep the total volume in check. So, how does one go about this? How do you simultaneously train strength and size, without adding too much volume that it becomes detrimental to the nervous system?
First and foremost, be honest with yourself. If you’re still a beginner (can you realistically squat 1.5x your bodyweight with perfect form yet?), and even if you’ve just entered into the “intermediate” portion of the continuum, don’t even concern yourself with this strategy. In all likelihood your technique is going to breakdown and you’ll expose yourself to injury.
Moving on, here’s what to do if you’re at the appropriate stage in your training:
Do a few heavy sets, and follow it up with one “back off” set of higher reps.
This way, you stimulate the high-threshold motor units via lower reps, and provide a solid strength stimulus. Then, the bodybuilder side of you can satisfy his/her craving via the “get your pump on” set at the end!
Here are a few examples:
3×5, 1×10
3×4, 1×12
2×5, 1xAMAP (“as many as possible”)
3×3, 1xL2ITT (“leave two in the tank”)
There are a bunch of ways to do this really. Putting the last example into a real-life example, here’s something I might do….
Using chinups as the lift of choice, I may work up to a heavy set of three, but still ensuring the reps are crisp and I’m not grinding them out. So, I might work up to 110×3:
Rest a couple minutes, and then do a bodyweight set of 17-18 chins, leaving a couple in the tank (it should be obvious but just in case: that higher rep set should utilize much less weight than the heavy sets).
I find these set-rep schemes lend themselves particular well to chins, squats, pushups, and rows.
A couple caveats:
- Don’t do this year round, but cycle in a few, 3-4 week blocks of this throughout your yearly training
- Be especially careful with the squats, stopping the set if you’re near failure and/or are turning your squats into an ugly “goodmorning/squat” combo. The more squat videos I see on the internet, the more hesitant I become in providing public advice like this because most people’s technique is atrocious at best.
- I’d avoid this high rep back-off set strategy with deadlifts as the risk:reward ratio simply isn’t worth it.
That’s it. You can use your imagination really….just do a few heavy sets, staying away from failure, and then back off the weight and get your pump on with one, higher rep set to finish it off.




nice post. thanks. question….
“I’d avoid this high rep back-off set strategy with deadlifts as the risk:reward ratio simply isn’t worth it.”….. presumably, you’re adjusting the weight to accommodate your prior workload…. is it that the risk is elevated, or the reward is negligible?
Great Frank, glad you liked it. As for the answer to your question: both. When we look at the deadlift, it’s basically a back, glute, and hamstring exercise but the weak link is the low back. Given that it’s a very technical/demanding lift I often find people’s form crumbling under a state of fatigue. I would rather someone receive their back volume through a movement such as a high rep row, and then, for the glutes/hams, do a high rep set of a pull-through or hip thrust (or related exercise) as the risk would be much lower. RDLs could be used, maybe, depending on the person.
However, I do feel that every now and then a “tonic” session of deadlifts can be useful, where you only perform one set of 10, and keep it at an honest 50% 1RM. This would replace your normal session of heavy deads.
thanks. this programming stuff has lots of moving parts. it’s not trivial….